![]() |
|
My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - Printable Version +- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net) +-- Forum: Maplestory (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=15) +--- Forum: Training Center (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=32) +---- Forum: Thief (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=43) +---- Thread: My "friend" and I were Arguing over this (/showthread.php?tid=2141) Pages:
1
2
|
My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - Slashermills2 - 2008-08-11 A DEXLESS THIEF VS a DEXLESS THief with DEX EQUIPS Can someone help me figure out the exact calculations? We'll say They have enough Dex in equips to equip a Scarab which is 25 base dex + 85 in equips Lets assume they both have nearly identical equips 4 attack Pac 2 Attack Face Stompers lets say the Dexless LUCK (Skanda user) has + 85 Luck in equips Wouldn't the Dexless Skanda user be more powerful if everything they had was the same stats? Also How much MORE attack would a Dexless Scarab user NEED to have in order to be more powerful than a Skanda user? My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - Devil - 2008-08-11 Slashermills2 Wrote:A DEXLESS THIEF VS a DEXLESS THief with DEX EQUIPSJust a few points: 1. The Skanda user is dexLESS 2. The Scarab user is LOWdex since he wears dex equips to wear the Scarab 3. With all the talking about dexless / lowdex / normaldex it is ALWAYS about TOTAL LUK and Weapon attack, when you talk about throwing stars. And if the Skanda user has 85 more luk then the lowdex Scarab user, he would need 85/5 = 17, ah well, lets say 15 weapon attack more then the Skanda user, which will never happen. That's why dexless Skanda users always win... (yay for $$$ for Nexon for AP resets....) My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - NoWaizMatt - 2008-08-11 Besides, given that they are oh, level 80, the stats would amost be impossible to get. Let's say 25 dex Sauna 2 att 8 dex FS 12 dex earrings 4 att 10 dex PAC 25 dex Zhelm 10 dex Face 10 dex Eye These equips would cost well over 1.5b I'd assume in total. Now, for the Luk. 10 luk from the Skanda 10 luk Earrings 4 att 10 luk PAC 25 luk Sauna 15 luk Zhelm And now we're screwed. There is nearly no other item in maplestory that would add the extra 30 luk, unless of course you had over max mesos and would by a 50 luk Sauna, which 1. Pretty much nobody has, and 2. If someone did have it, it'd be worth around 6b. So in all, 85 luk at that level for a hermit isn't exactly possible. My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - Pikachu - 2008-08-11 REGARDLESS Skanda user will be more powerful... which pisses me off. My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - Slashermills2 - 2008-08-11 He argued with me about it for 30 minutes trying to tell me how he was right and I was wrong I know a Luck Dexless wins vs a Dex Dexless but he wouldn't listen Also you are right NoWaizMatt it would be hard to get an equal amount but it would make a FAIR comparison to how much stronger a Skanda Dexless is compared to a Scarab Dexless My friend "tested" this on a few Private servers <_< Do private servers have some kind of L7 pineapple up? Because I'd assume that for a Low Dex with a 53 scarab to be better than a dexless with a 53 Skanda there would have to be some pineapple up in the L7 Formula.. My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - ★tastie - 2008-08-12 Slashermills2 Wrote:He argued with me about it for 30 minutes trying to tell me how he was right and I was wrong wtp is a dex dexless? a scarab user with 25 dex is called LOW DEX. use common sense. if a scarab and a skanda have the same attack, and the skanda user gets luk bonus while scarab users get dex bonus.... OBVIOUSLY the skanda user is stronger because they have MORE LUK. speaking in terms of a 25 base dex scarab user might falsely show that dexless is stronger than low dex. it really depends upon TOTAL weapon attack and luk bonus. My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - Silver_ice - 2008-08-14 in the end. there are too many dex equips to say skandas are better look at the 88 atk or so dragon sleeve and a low dex(25 base) 19x nl can wear it so wats worth more a 60 atk skanda or a 88 atk sleeve low dex>dexless>high dex simple enough? My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - DrTriixx - 2008-08-14 a scarab is a 2-3 avrg base w.atk higher than a skanda. so the scarab user would have to get 85dex minus the 3 w.atk advantage from equips which can get dex but not luk in order to match a skanda user. with earring luk scrolls out the only equips a skanda user can't take full advantage of are shoes, zhelm, HT pendant and face accessories, considering the 2 are beyond godly the difference would look like this helm (35 possible) + pendant (22 possible) + shoes (15 possible) + face (10 possible) = 82 dex if the scarab user gets 3 dex from something such as scrolling first slot on earrings for dex, everything else could be luk equips which would make the scarab user stronger. but thats not realistic, realistically average people would have something like this helm-25 pendant-2 shoes-6 face - 5 = 38 dex so he'd have to get the rest of his dex from other equips which would make skanda better for the average person but giving a scarab user higher potential. at least until much higher lvls where like 10 luk = 1 w.atk but my hermit is only 85 so i cant tell you what lvl that is, but i know its pretty high O.o My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - Kawasari Mimoto - 2008-08-14 I've said this before, and I'll dare say it again. Quote:"A single point in weapon attack > a couple points into LUK." Because if you think about it, people make DEXless Hermits because 4-5 pts of LUK = WA (this depends on your total WA / LUK, and then having to use the formula to figure it out). However, in the long run, it expands as you get stronger, depending on how much total WA / LUK you have, so then it becomes 5-6 LUK = 1 WA, and so far. So, I ask you, does DEXless still beat low-DEX Craven / Sleeve user? Of course, keeping in mind that the new Raven claws are soon to be released, we'll see how far a DEXless can go.. I assure you, people are most likely gonna have a problem mass-scrolling them too. -Lord of the Night Sky My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - ZooK - 2008-08-14 25 base with scarab = dexless imo :f6: HI KHOI LOl My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - wobbufet - 2008-08-14 If you can afford these kinds of dex equips you shouldnt be wearing a 53 scarab@@@@ My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - DrTriixx - 2008-08-14 wobbufet Wrote:If you can afford these kinds of dex equips you shouldnt be wearing a 53 scarab@@@@ uh, that doesn't really matter when comparing the 2 O.o My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - Firefux - 2008-08-14 Kasuhitomi Wrote:I've said this before, and I'll dare say it again. Don't forget to factor in that dexless claws are faster, thus more attacks for the dexless user. So, Lowdex might be doing more damage in numbers, but dexless could also be doing more damage over time in the same instance lol. My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - FantaTwist - 2008-08-14 Dexless lose too much on dex bonus stats from equips such as zakum helmet, horntail pendant (+1) and shoes. As for us low dex Night Lords out there we for sure have more stats in our top and bottoms, horntail pendant, zakum helmet (scrolled) and shoes too. All this added up dex can bring us down to 25 dex BASE (Yes this is possible, i've seen it happen with a caster user) which makes us sitting in the same boat as DEXless night lords but one thing that's different is that we'll be having a higher level base claw which means more attack resulting this round goes to low dex by far. My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - jikos - 2008-08-14 its very possible to equip a scarab while using ALL luk equips that a skanda user uses. i myself am close to doing it i just need the ht pendant >.> 29dex zhelm 7dex facestompers 8dex rat face 14dex 2 luk pants 2 dex 20luk top 22dex horntail pendant (egged) as you can see... that leaves me with being able to equip a scarab with 28base dex while still being able to have a luk cape, luk earrings, and a top+bottom that gives me 22luk. and theres still plenty of room for improvement. its not to hard to scroll a 31dex zhelm (if i have the balls to drop my current zhelm lol) and an 8dex facestompers isnt to hard to come across. so after that being said, you decide which is better. My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - DrTriixx - 2008-08-15 what it really comes down to though is whether or not you can get a horntail pendant because without it you would need to find 25 more dex (in jikos situation) to be able to equip the scarab keeping a 25 base dex. so with a HT pendant, yes dexless scarab user is stronger BUT considering how much HT pendants cost and assuming both have the same funding, a skanda user could easily upgrade his claw maybe 4-5 w.atk higher depending on what his previous skanda was. oh, and a skanda user would be able to get a pretty good luk sauna with the amount it would cost for your top and bottom, so you would lose out in luk there. but straight up im kynda biased and not that dope a hermit so i could be wrong O.o so like i said before, in my opinion, low dex has more potential than dexless but i see dexless as being a stronger choice on average >.< My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - Management - 2008-08-15 Firefux Wrote:Don't forget to factor in that dexless claws are faster, thus more attacks for the dexless user. Don't forget that they attack the same amount of times in any given period of time, despite the weapon speed. My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - Corn - 2008-08-15 This thread is completely useless now with the level 90 dexless claw out. Resume when dexed claws reach level 140 please =D. My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - Hazzy - 2008-08-15 When did LowDex go from having a low base Dex to using Dex Gear to wear stuff? :f6: My "friend" and I were Arguing over this - Dusk - 2008-08-16 The Skanda user would always win because you're comparing it to a Scarab, which is only barely more powerful than a Skanda and has a much higher dex requirement. Compare it to a Sleve and see who would win. |