![]() |
|
Anyone good with index notation and vector calculus? - Printable Version +- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net) +-- Forum: Social (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Rubik's Cube (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Thread: Anyone good with index notation and vector calculus? (/showthread.php?tid=1806) |
Anyone good with index notation and vector calculus? - Wani - 2008-07-30 Okay, I'm studying the kronecker delta and the alternating tensor. (As in e[123] = e[231] = e[312] = 1, e[321] = e[132] = e[213] = -1, e[ijk] = 0 otherwise). I have to prove that e[ijk]e[rsk] = δ[ir]δ[js] - δ[is]δ[jr] using the identity (This is gonna be hard to write ![]() e[ijk]e[rst] = | δ[ir] δ[is] δ[it] | | δ[jr] δ[js] δ[jt] | | δ[kr] δ[ks] δ[kt] | But every time I go through it, I wind up with the signs backwards, ie e[ijk]e[rsk] = δ[is]δ[jr] - δ[ir]δ[js] Anyone have any idea what I might be doing wrong? Anyone good with index notation and vector calculus? - Stereo - 2008-07-30 | δ[ir] δ[is] δ[ik] | | δ[jr] δ[js] δ[jk] | | δ[kr] δ[ks] δ[kk] | +δ[ir]. | δ[js] δ[jk] | | δ[ks] 1.... | - δ[is]. | δ[jr] δ[jk] | | δ[kr] 1.... | + δ[ik]. | δ[jr] δ[js] | | δ[kr] δ[ks] | δ[ir].δ[js] - δ[ir].δ[jk].δ[ks] - δ[is].δ[jr] + δ[is].δ[jk].δ[kr] + δ[ik].δ[jr].δ[ks] - δ[ik].δ[js].δ[kr] I guess you wnt wrong just expanding the determinant? I'm pretty sure this is right. edit: no code tags?
Anyone good with index notation and vector calculus? - Wani - 2008-07-31 Umm.... no, if you simplify what you got down, you got the exact same thing as me. Everything but the last line cancels out: δ[ik].δ[jr].δ[ks] - δ[ik].δ[js].δ[kr] =+ δ[is].δ[jr] - δ[ir].δ[js] Anyone good with index notation and vector calculus? - Worthyness - 2008-07-31 Holy Crap that looks ridiculous 0_o Looks like a bunch of random symbols... Mind telling me what they're used for so that i can read about it? It all looks so... Interesting. Anyone good with index notation and vector calculus? - Wani - 2008-07-31 lol The alternating tensor, e, is basically used because it's perfectly anti-symmetric, as in e[ijk] = -e[jik], e[ijk] = -e[kji], e[ijk] = -e[ikj], which has a lot of useful applications in things like cross products of vectors, probably more that I haven't learn yet. The kronecker delta, δ is basically the identity matrix, if you've studied matrices before. Basically, it acts like 1. δ[ij] is 1 if i=j, and 0 anywhere else. Anyone good with index notation and vector calculus? - Kalovale - 2008-07-31 Worthyness Wrote:Holy Crap that looks ridiculous 0_o He introduced it already >.> Kronecker's Delta, antisymmetric tensor Hope you have fun, I didn't
Anyone good with index notation and vector calculus? - Wani - 2008-07-31 Aha! I figured what I did wrong! Stereo, δ[kk] isn't 1, it's the trace of I. Since this is in 3 dimensions, it's 1 + 1 + 1 = 3. | δ[ir] δ[is] δ[ik] | | δ[jr] δ[js] δ[jk] | | δ[kr] δ[ks] δ[kk] | +δ[ir]. | δ[js] δ[jk] | | δ[ks] 3.... | - δ[is]. | δ[jr] δ[jk] | | δ[kr] 3.... | + δ[ik]. | δ[jr] δ[js] | | δ[kr] δ[ks] | 3.δ[ir].δ[js] - δ[ir].δ[jk].δ[ks] - 3.δ[is].δ[jr] + δ[is].δ[jk].δ[kr] + δ[ik].δ[jr].δ[ks] - δ[ik].δ[js].δ[kr] = δ[ir]δ[js] - δ[is]δ[jr] As required. |