+- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net)
+-- Forum: Main (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+--- Forum: Nexon Announcements (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=20)
+--- Thread: Aran Update Notes (/showthread.php?tid=20191)
Aran Update Notes - ZottenKerel - 2009-12-09
It's pretty obvious how the rings will probably work.
Get to lvl 30, get a +1 all stat 1att ring, that is ona of a kind, xferable between chars, trade block, etc.
Get to lvl 50, get a +2 all stat 2att ring (if that's the correct stats, idk) ONLY if you hand in the preliminery ring, UPGRADE.
Same goes for the lvl 70 one. You don't think they'll just let you store it and make a few rings, do ya? I doubt nexon is that stupid.
Edit: As for the deleting aran and remake for next ring, in KMS and Msea the rings are connected to the aran, so deleting the aran deletes the ring.
Aran Update Notes - Spideyjvc - 2009-12-09
ZottenKerel Wrote:It's pretty obvious how the rings will probably work.
Get to lvl 30, get a +1 all stat 1att ring, that is ona of a kind, xferable between chars, trade block, etc.
Get to lvl 50, get a +2 all stat 2att ring (if that's the correct stats, idk) ONLY if you hand in the preliminery ring, UPGRADE.
Same goes for the lvl 70 one. You don't think they'll just let you store it and make a few rings, do ya? I doubt nexon is that stupid.
That's not the problem, we've reached this conclusion already. The problem is that this makes it possible to get all 3 rings if you delete your Aran after each ring, transfering them before deletion. Then remake the Aran to get the next ring, repeating the process until you have all 3 rings on your main.
Aran Update Notes - FrozNlite - 2009-12-09
lolringdebate
Aran Update Notes - RIPGobies - 2009-12-09
So no update on exp formula?
Aran Update Notes - FelixTM - 2009-12-09
ZottenKerel Wrote:Edit: As for the deleting aran and remake for next ring, in KMS and Msea the rings are connected to the aran, so deleting the aran deletes the ring.
I didn't know this. That's a perfect solution for this three ring problem. As long as GMS follows suit, there won't be any issues.
Aran Update Notes - Jedward - 2009-12-09
FrozNlite Wrote:lolringdebate
Yeah, this.
ZottenKerel Wrote:Edit: As for the deleting aran and remake for next ring, in KMS and Msea the rings are connected to the aran, so deleting the aran deletes the ring.
Though I guess you can have an account with multiple Aran. :\
Aran Update Notes - Worthyness - 2009-12-09
AM i the only one that thinks that there will be some glitch for the new world exclusive quest that gives you mesos? Like the one in Maplesea where you could get like max mesos after making a level 10 character for a while? o_o
But yay for stacking rings if there are! Then my dex finding days are over and i can focus on the equinox!
Aran Update Notes - kingdj333 - 2009-12-09
ZottenKerel Wrote:It's pretty obvious how the rings will probably work.
Get to lvl 30, get a +1 all stat 1att ring, that is ona of a kind, xferable between chars, trade block, etc.
Get to lvl 50, get a +2 all stat 2att ring (if that's the correct stats, idk) ONLY if you hand in the preliminery ring, UPGRADE.
Same goes for the lvl 70 one. You don't think they'll just let you store it and make a few rings, do ya? I doubt [SIZE="4"]nexon is that stupid.[/SIZE]
Edit: As for the deleting aran and remake for next ring, in KMS and Msea the rings are connected to the aran, so deleting the aran deletes the ring.
I pray to God, Nexon become's fools!
RIPGobies Wrote:So no update on exp formula?
Nope, it stays- now we can all rejoyce!
Anyways, about the ring- I think
Aran Update Notes - Spideyjvc - 2009-12-09
ZottenKerel Wrote:Edit: As for the deleting aran and remake for next ring, in KMS and Msea the rings are connected to the aran, so deleting the aran deletes the ring.
If this is true, then the whole debate over that method is resolved so long as GMS does the Aran ring connection as well. However, this just brings up the question of what happens with people that have multiple Aran? If we get 1 free slot, I'm sure there's someone who'd happily delete 2 mules to make 3 Aran mules on their account instead. This would be another method for all 3 rings.
It kills one problem, but still leaves another in tact.
Damn Nexon, why couldn't you keep it simple?
Aran Update Notes - 2147483647 - 2009-12-09
ZottenKerel Wrote:Edit: As for the deleting aran and remake for next ring, in KMS and Msea the rings are connected to the aran, so deleting the aran deletes the ring.Even if you use an item lock?
Aran Update Notes - Takebacker - 2009-12-09
ZottenKerel Wrote:Edit: As for the deleting aran and remake for next ring, in KMS and Msea the rings are connected to the aran, so deleting the aran deletes the ring.
If this is true people will just have 3 arans on one account. A lv 30, 50, and 70.
Aran Update Notes - Spideyjvc - 2009-12-09
2147483647 Wrote:Even if you use an item lock?
Oh wow, here comes exploit theory #3 to the rescue.
Aran Update Notes - Sarah - 2009-12-09
kingdj333 Wrote:Nope, it stays- now we can all rejoyce!There's no proof that we'll keep the old formula. Nexon probably added it and will wait for people to find out before announcing it or they'll just play ignorant and go HUH WE DIDN'T KNOW THAT WAS IN THE DATA. OH WELL IT'S TOO DIFFICULT TO REMOVE.
Anyways, about the ring- I think
Announcing it would just cause so much unnecessary drama.
Aran Update Notes - Takebacker - 2009-12-09
Spideyjvc Wrote:Oh wow, here comes exploit theory #3 to the rescue.
Not feasible. If locked items have slots and are blown up the item and lock obviously disappear.
Thus, locks = useless.
Aran Update Notes - Milelke - 2009-12-09
You guys are jumping to conclusions about the exp formula. As of now, it seems like it will stay.
However, the patch could finish and there could a surprise notice about the change... heck, they don't even have to put a notice, they could be stupid and just be like "Oh, deal with it yourselves."
I have no idea what you guys are planning to do with these rings, but, Nexon isn't that stupid.
Aran Update Notes - kingdj333 - 2009-12-09
BombsAway Wrote:There's no proof that we'll keep the old formula. Nexon probably added it and will wait for people to find out before announcing it or they'll just play ignorant and go HUH WE DIDN'T KNOW THAT WAS IN THE DATA. OH WELL IT'S TOO DIFFICULT TO REMOVE.
That'd piss me and other people off! Atleast tell us?
Aran Update Notes - Sarah - 2009-12-09
kingdj333 Wrote:That'd piss me and other people off! Atleast tell us?
It's going to piss people off either way. Announcing it will just cause them to be flooded with stupid reports while they're trying to get stuff done.
Y RU SO MEAN I WANT 2 LEECH
Aran Update Notes - FrozNlite - 2009-12-09
Milelke Wrote:[SIZE="7"]You guys are jumping to conclusions about the exp formula and the ring situation.[/SIZE]
Fixed and ENLARGED for truth.
Aran Update Notes - MetaSeraphim - 2009-12-09
There is just too much debate about these rings. lol
Easier to just wait and see.
Aran Update Notes - Stereo - 2009-12-09
Milelke Wrote:Nexon isn't that stupid.
Famous last words...
It'll probably end up like HT Pendants, where they fix it after letting people make massive profits from the glitch for a month.