Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - Loose - 2011-03-31
That truly was an amazing speech the man gave. If it was posted on Facebook, I'd give it 7 Likes and a comment saying how awesome it was.
Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - octopusprime - 2011-03-31
kanevaldier Wrote:I dont think so. Having looked at many sources of information, not just wikipedia, I have found quite a bit out. First as it relates to perjury, he was convicted of that on 2 counts. The only reason he was not convicted of espionage was because the statute of limitations had run out. One of the many flaws of or judicial system. Anyway, in order to commit perjury, you have to lie and get caught in the lie and that is exactly what happened. That said there is evidence to back up the claim that he was a spy for russia but that is another topic.
> what you said initially is not made true by this post. and i really don't think you're familiar with the case at all. The man never changed his story one time. chambers did. then he magically produced documents that were typed on hiss's typerwriter which hiss had not had for some years. this evidence would got laughed out of court in an instant today. He's an obvious victim of witch hunting and a means for chambers to save his own ass from his former communist involvement. INCLUDING BEING A DOCUMENTED SPY FOR THE SOVIETS. But hey, that doesn't consistentatly destroy someones credibility. especially when it's beyond a shadow of a doubt that hev (chambers) was a spy. The man solely responsible for any stains on Hiss's records is a turncoat. You discredit hiss because he was an alleged spy. BUT IGNORE THAT THE SOURCE OF THE ALLEGATION WAS A KNOWN, ADMITTED, AND DOCUMENTED SPY WHO LIED UNDER OATH SEVERAL TIMES.
[sarcasm] You're consistent and levelheaded and what you're doing isn't a complete failed ad hominem[/sarcasm]
Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - Rob - 2011-03-31
kanevaldier Wrote:No, you are reading it right. However, the provisions for that are in my previous post, so the time table does not matter since the action is not justified.
Where does it even say that he requires justification? That's nowhere to be seen.
Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - kanevaldier - 2011-04-01
Rob Wrote:Where does it even say that he requires justification? That's nowhere to be seen.
Ok so just to be clear on this, I have put the bill in right here and bolded the areas of interest.
Quote:SHORT TITLE
SECTION 1. This joint resolution may be cited as the "War Powers Resolution".
PURPOSE AND POLICY
SEC. 2. (a) It is the purpose of this joint resolution to fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the collective judgement of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations.
(b) Under article I, section 8, of the Constitution, it is specifically provided that the Congress shall have the power to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution, not only its own powers but also all other powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.
© The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.
CONSULTATION
SEC. 3. The President in every possible instance shall consult with Congress before introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situation where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and after every such introduction shall consult regularly with the Congress until United States Armed Forces are no longer engaged in hostilities or have been removed from such situations.
REPORTING
SEC. 4. (a) In the absence of a declaration of war, in any case in which United States Armed Forces are introduced--
(1) into hostilities or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances;
(2) into the territory, airspace or waters of a foreign nation, while equipped for combat, except for deployments which relate solely to supply, replacement, repair, or training of such forces; or
(3) in numbers which substantially enlarge United States Armed Forces equipped for combat already located in a foreign nation; the president shall submit within 48 hours to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the President pro tempore of the Senate a report, in writing, setting forth--
(A) the circumstances necessitating the introduction of United States Armed Forces;
(B) the constitutional and legislative authority under which such introduction took place; and
© the estimated scope and duration of the hostilities or involvement.
(b) The President shall provide such other information as the Congress may request in the fulfillment of its constitutional responsibilities with respect to committing the Nation to war and to the use of United States Armed Forces abroad
© Whenever United States Armed Forces are introduced into hostilities or into any situation described in subsection (a) of this section, the President shall, so long as such armed forces continue to be engaged in such hostilities or situation, report to the Congress periodically on the status of such hostilities or situation as well as on the scope and duration of such hostilities or situation, but in no event shall he report to the Congress less often than once every six months.
CONGRESSIONAL ACTION
SEC. 5. (a) Each report submitted pursuant to section 4(a)(1) shall be transmitted to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the President pro tempore of the Senate on the same calendar day. Each report so transmitted shall be referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate for appropriate action. If, when the report is transmitted, the Congress has adjourned sine die or has adjourned for any period in excess of three calendar days, the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate, if they deem it advisable (or if petitioned by at least 30 percent of the membership of their respective Houses) shall jointly request the President to convene Congress in order that it may consider the report and take appropriate action pursuant to this section.
(b) Within sixty calendar days after a report is submitted or is required to be submitted pursuant to section 4(a)(1), whichever is earlier, the President shall terminate any use of United States Armed Forces with respect to which such report was submitted (or required to be submitted), unless the Congress (1) has declared war or has enacted a specific authorization for such use of United States Armed Forces, (2) has extended by law such sixty-day period, or (3) is physically unable to meet as a result of an armed attack upon the United States. Such sixty-day period shall be extended for not more than an additional thirty days if the President determines and certifies to the Congress in writing that unavoidable military necessity respecting the safety of United States Armed Forces requires the continued use of such armed forces in the course of bringing about a prompt removal of such forces.
© Notwithstanding subsection (b), at any time that United States Armed Forces are engaged in hostilities outside the territory of the United States, its possessions and territories without a declaration of war or specific statutory authorization, such forces shall be removed by the President if the Congress so directs by concurrent resolution.
CONGRESSIONAL PRIORITY PROCEDURES FOR JOINT RESOLUTION OR BILL
SEC. 6. (a) Any joint resolution or bill introduced pursuant to section 5(b) at least thirty calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in such section shall be referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives or the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, as the case may be, and such committee shall report one such joint resolution or bill, together with its recommendations, not later than twenty-four calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in such section, unless such House shall otherwise determine by the yeas and nays.
(b) Any joint resolution or bill so reported shall become the pending business of the House in question (in the case of the Senate the time for debate shall be equally divided between the proponents and the opponents), and shall be voted on within three calendar days thereafter, unless such House shall otherwise determine by yeas and nays.
© Such a joint resolution or bill passed by one House shall be referred to the committee of the other House named in subsection (a) and shall be reported out not later than fourteen calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in section 5(b). The joint resolution or bill so reported shall become the pending business of the House in question and shall be voted on within three calendar days after it has been reported, unless such House shall otherwise determine by yeas and nays.
(d) In the case of any disagreement between the two Houses of Congress with respect to a joint resolution or bill passed by both Houses, conferees shall be promptly appointed and the committee of conference shall make and file a report with respect to such resolution or bill not later than four calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in section 5(b). In the event the conferees are unable to agree within 48 hours, they shall report back to their respective Houses in disagreement. Notwithstanding any rule in either House concerning the printing of conference reports in the Record or concerning any delay in the consideration of such reports, such report shall be acted on by both Houses not later than the expiration of such sixty-day period.
CONGRESSIONAL PRIORITY PROCEDURES FOR CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
SEC. 7. (a) Any concurrent resolution introduced pursuant to section 5(b) at least thirty calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in such section shall be referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives or the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, as the case may be, and one such concurrent resolution shall be reported out by such committee together with its recommendations within fifteen calendar days, unless such House shall otherwise determine by the yeas and nays.
(b) Any concurrent resolution so reported shall become the pending business of the House in question (in the case of the Senate the time for debate shall be equally divided between the proponents and the opponents), and shall be voted on within three calendar days thereafter, unless such House shall otherwise determine by yeas and nays.
© Such a concurrent resolution passed by one House shall be referred to the committee of the other House named in subsection (a) and shall be reported out by such committee together with its recommendations within fifteen calendar days and shall thereupon become the pending business of such House and shall be voted on within three calendar days after it has been reported, unless such House shall otherwise determine by yeas and nays.
(d) In the case of any disagreement between the two Houses of Congress with respect to a concurrent resolution passed by both Houses, conferees shall be promptly appointed and the committee of conference shall make and file a report with respect to such concurrent resolution within six calendar days after the legislation is referred to the committee of conference. Notwithstanding any rule in either House concerning the printing of conference reports in the Record or concerning any delay in the consideration of such reports, such report shall be acted on by both Houses not later than six calendar days after the conference report is filed. In the event the conferees are unable to agree within 48 hours, they shall report back to their respective Houses in disagreement.
INTERPRETATION OF JOINT RESOLUTION
SEC. 8. (a) Authority to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situations wherein involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances shall not be inferred--
(1) from any provision of law (whether or not in effect before the date of the enactment of this joint resolution), including any provision contained in any appropriation Act, unless such provision specifically authorizes the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into such situations and stating that it is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of this joint resolution; or
(2) from any treaty heretofore or hereafter ratified unless such treaty is implemented by legislation specifically authorizing the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into such situations and stating that it is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of this joint resolution.
(b) Nothing in this joint resolution shall be construed to require any further specific statutory authorization to permit members of United States Armed Forces to participate jointly with members of the armed forces of one or more foreign countries in the headquarters operations of high-level military commands which were established prior to the date of enactment of this joint resolution and pursuant to the United Nations Charter or any treaty ratified by the United States prior to such date.
© For purposes of this joint resolution, the term "introduction of United States Armed Forces" includes the assignment of member of such armed forces to command, coordinate, participate in the movement of, or accompany the regular or irregular military forces of any foreign country or government when such military forces are engaged, or there exists an imminent threat that such forces will become engaged, in hostilities.
(d) Nothing in this joint resolution--
(1) is intended to alter the constitutional authority of the Congress or of the President, or the provision of existing treaties; or
(2) shall be construed as granting any authority to the President with respect to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situations wherein involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances which authority he would not have had in the absence of this joint resolution.
SEPARABILITY CLAUSE
SEC. 9. If any provision of this joint resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the joint resolution and the application of such provision to any other person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby.
EFFECTIVE DATE
SEC. 10. This joint resolution shall take effect on the date of its enactment.
Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - Loose - 2011-04-01
But his words are so powerful, they can change many things. Speeches are powerful and that's why they're made, from Abraham Lincoln to Martin Luther King Jr.
Don't you just love the way he speaks? He's so secure and certain of what he says, that man has a way with words.
Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - KhainiWest - 2011-04-01
kanevaldier Wrote:Ok so just to be clear on this, I have put the bill in right here and bolded the areas of interest.
From my understanding those circumstances indeed apply.
Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - Kalovale - 2011-04-01
Quote:c) The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.
Sounds fair enough to me.
Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - octopusprime - 2011-04-01
kanevaldier Wrote:Ok so just to be clear on this, I have put the bill in right here and bolded the areas of interest.
I'll just bold the one you don't seem to be getting.
WPR Wrote:SHORT TITLE
SECTION 1. This joint resolution may be cited as the "War Powers Resolution".
PURPOSE AND POLICY
SEC. 2. (a) It is the purpose of this joint resolution to fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the collective judgement of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations.
(b) Under article I, section 8, of the Constitution, it is specifically provided that the Congress shall have the power to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution, not only its own powers but also all other powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.
© The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.
CONSULTATION
SEC. 3. The President in every possible instance shall consult with Congress before introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situation where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and after every such introduction shall consult regularly with the Congress until United States Armed Forces are no longer engaged in hostilities or have been removed from such situations.
REPORTING
SEC. 4. (a) In the absence of a declaration of war, in any case in which United States Armed Forces are introduced--
(1) into hostilities or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances;
(2) into the territory, airspace or waters of a foreign nation, while equipped for combat, except for deployments which relate solely to supply, replacement, repair, or training of such forces; or
(3) in numbers which substantially enlarge United States Armed Forces equipped for combat already located in a foreign nation; the president shall submit within 48 hours to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the President pro tempore of the Senate a report, in writing, setting forth--
(A) the circumstances necessitating the introduction of United States Armed Forces;
(B) the constitutional and legislative authority under which such introduction took place; and
© the estimated scope and duration of the hostilities or involvement.
(b) The President shall provide such other information as the Congress may request in the fulfillment of its constitutional responsibilities with respect to committing the Nation to war and to the use of United States Armed Forces abroad
© Whenever United States Armed Forces are introduced into hostilities or into any situation described in subsection (a) of this section, the President shall, so long as such armed forces continue to be engaged in such hostilities or situation, report to the Congress periodically on the status of such hostilities or situation as well as on the scope and duration of such hostilities or situation, but in no event shall he report to the Congress less often than once every six months.
CONGRESSIONAL ACTION
SEC. 5. (a) Each report submitted pursuant to section 4(a)(1) shall be transmitted to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the President pro tempore of the Senate on the same calendar day. Each report so transmitted shall be referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate for appropriate action. If, when the report is transmitted, the Congress has adjourned sine die or has adjourned for any period in excess of three calendar days, the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate, if they deem it advisable (or if petitioned by at least 30 percent of the membership of their respective Houses) shall jointly request the President to convene Congress in order that it may consider the report and take appropriate action pursuant to this section.
(b) Within sixty calendar days after a report is submitted or is required to be submitted pursuant to section 4(a)(1), whichever is earlier, the President shall terminate any use of United States Armed Forces with respect to which such report was submitted (or required to be submitted), unless the Congress (1) has declared war or has enacted a specific authorization for such use of United States Armed Forces, (2) has extended by law such sixty-day period, or (3) is physically unable to meet as a result of an armed attack upon the United States. Such sixty-day period shall be extended for not more than an additional thirty days if the President determines and certifies to the Congress in writing that unavoidable military necessity respecting the safety of United States Armed Forces requires the continued use of such armed forces in the course of bringing about a prompt removal of such forces.
© Notwithstanding subsection (b), at any time that United States Armed Forces are engaged in hostilities outside the territory of the United States, its possessions and territories without a declaration of war or specific statutory authorization, such forces shall be removed by the President if the Congress so directs by concurrent resolution.
CONGRESSIONAL PRIORITY PROCEDURES FOR JOINT RESOLUTION OR BILL
SEC. 6. (a) Any joint resolution or bill introduced pursuant to section 5(b) at least thirty calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in such section shall be referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives or the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, as the case may be, and such committee shall report one such joint resolution or bill, together with its recommendations, not later than twenty-four calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in such section, unless such House shall otherwise determine by the yeas and nays.
(b) Any joint resolution or bill so reported shall become the pending business of the House in question (in the case of the Senate the time for debate shall be equally divided between the proponents and the opponents), and shall be voted on within three calendar days thereafter, unless such House shall otherwise determine by yeas and nays.
© Such a joint resolution or bill passed by one House shall be referred to the committee of the other House named in subsection (a) and shall be reported out not later than fourteen calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in section 5(b). The joint resolution or bill so reported shall become the pending business of the House in question and shall be voted on within three calendar days after it has been reported, unless such House shall otherwise determine by yeas and nays.
(d) In the case of any disagreement between the two Houses of Congress with respect to a joint resolution or bill passed by both Houses, conferees shall be promptly appointed and the committee of conference shall make and file a report with respect to such resolution or bill not later than four calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in section 5(b). In the event the conferees are unable to agree within 48 hours, they shall report back to their respective Houses in disagreement. Notwithstanding any rule in either House concerning the printing of conference reports in the Record or concerning any delay in the consideration of such reports, such report shall be acted on by both Houses not later than the expiration of such sixty-day period.
CONGRESSIONAL PRIORITY PROCEDURES FOR CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
SEC. 7. (a) Any concurrent resolution introduced pursuant to section 5(b) at least thirty calendar days before the expiration of the sixty-day period specified in such section shall be referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives or the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, as the case may be, and one such concurrent resolution shall be reported out by such committee together with its recommendations within fifteen calendar days, unless such House shall otherwise determine by the yeas and nays.
(b) Any concurrent resolution so reported shall become the pending business of the House in question (in the case of the Senate the time for debate shall be equally divided between the proponents and the opponents), and shall be voted on within three calendar days thereafter, unless such House shall otherwise determine by yeas and nays.
© Such a concurrent resolution passed by one House shall be referred to the committee of the other House named in subsection (a) and shall be reported out by such committee together with its recommendations within fifteen calendar days and shall thereupon become the pending business of such House and shall be voted on within three calendar days after it has been reported, unless such House shall otherwise determine by yeas and nays.
(d) In the case of any disagreement between the two Houses of Congress with respect to a concurrent resolution passed by both Houses, conferees shall be promptly appointed and the committee of conference shall make and file a report with respect to such concurrent resolution within six calendar days after the legislation is referred to the committee of conference. Notwithstanding any rule in either House concerning the printing of conference reports in the Record or concerning any delay in the consideration of such reports, such report shall be acted on by both Houses not later than six calendar days after the conference report is filed. In the event the conferees are unable to agree within 48 hours, they shall report back to their respective Houses in disagreement.
INTERPRETATION OF JOINT RESOLUTION
SEC. 8. (a) Authority to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situations wherein involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances shall not be inferred--
(1) from any provision of law (whether or not in effect before the date of the enactment of this joint resolution), including any provision contained in any appropriation Act, unless such provision specifically authorizes the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into such situations and stating that it is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of this joint resolution; or
(2) from any treaty heretofore or hereafter ratified unless such treaty is implemented by legislation specifically authorizing the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into such situations and stating that it is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of this joint resolution.
(b) Nothing in this joint resolution shall be construed to require any further specific statutory authorization to permit members of United States Armed Forces to participate jointly with members of the armed forces of one or more foreign countries in the headquarters operations of high-level military commands which were established prior to the date of enactment of this joint resolution and pursuant to the United Nations Charter or any treaty ratified by the United States prior to such date.
© For purposes of this joint resolution, the term "introduction of United States Armed Forces" includes the assignment of member of such armed forces to command, coordinate, participate in the movement of, or accompany the regular or irregular military forces of any foreign country or government when such military forces are engaged, or there exists an imminent threat that such forces will become engaged, in hostilities.
(d) Nothing in this joint resolution--
(1) is intended to alter the constitutional authority of the Congress or of the President, or the provision of existing treaties; or
(2) shall be construed as granting any authority to the President with respect to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situations wherein involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances which authority he would not have had in the absence of this joint resolution.
SEPARABILITY CLAUSE
SEC. 9. If any provision of this joint resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the joint resolution and the application of such provision to any other person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby.
EFFECTIVE DATE
SEC. 10. This joint resolution shall take effect on the date of its enactment.
Twenty-three times.
Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - kanevaldier - 2011-04-01
octopusprime Wrote:I'll just bold the one you don't seem to be getting. Twenty-three times.
What you seem to be missing is the fact that the hostilities must present a danger to the U.S. Which they dont. At best the situation in Libya could be considered a civil war and that does not threaten the U.S. at all.
Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - kanevaldier - 2011-04-01
Loose Wrote:But his words are so powerful, they can change many things. Speeches are powerful and that's why they're made, from Abraham Lincoln to Martin Luther King Jr.
Don't you just love the way he speaks? He's so secure and certain of what he says, that man has a way with words.
If you didnt notice during his speach he stammered almost every time he turned away from the telepromter. I will give he credit, he can read a teleprompter like no one else can but take that from him and he has got nothing.
Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - octopusprime - 2011-04-01
kanevaldier Wrote:What you seem to be missing is the fact that the hostilities must present a danger to the U.S. Which they dont. At best the situation in Libya could be considered a civil war and that does not threaten the U.S. at all.
What you don't seem to be getting is that THE US IS NOT ENGAGING IN HOSTILITIES. It's kind of important to making the WPR apply AT ALL.
Here, read this again.
WPR SEC 2 a) the statement of goddamn purpose Wrote:It is the purpose of this joint resolution to fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the collective judgement of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations.
Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - KhainiWest - 2011-04-01
kanevaldier Wrote:What you seem to be missing is the fact that the hostilities must present a danger to the U.S. Which they dont. At best the situation in Libya could be considered a civil war and that does not threaten the U.S. at all.
No ground forces=No engagement. We are enforcing the no fly zone. The end.
Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - kanevaldier - 2011-04-01
octopusprime Wrote:What you don't seem to be getting is that THE US IS NOT ENGAGING IN HOSTILITIES. It's kind of important to making the WPR apply AT ALL.
We are engaged in hostilities just by using our armed forces to attack the Libyan forces.
KhainiWest Wrote:No ground forces=No engagement. We are enforcing the no fly zone. The end.
No ground forces does not = no engagement. We are engaging them by using our air power and missles to disable their forces. That is a military engagement.
Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - KhainiWest - 2011-04-01
kanevaldier Wrote:We are engaged in hostilities just by using our armed forces to attack the Libyan forces.
No ground forces does not = no engagement. We are engaging them by using our air power and missles to disable their forces. That is a military engagement.
No, it's enforcing the no fly zone.
Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - kanevaldier - 2011-04-01
KhainiWest Wrote:No, it's enforcing the no fly zone.
Right, but any action with our military against a foreign power is an act of war. It does not matter if we are enforcing a no fly zone or not. Also, a no fly zone does not mean the bombing of equipment unless they are preparing to launch the air craft. We bombed their air bases when there was no such indication. That is an act of war. I dont think you fully understand what an act of war means nor do you understand what a no fly zone is.
Sending our troops into Libyan air space is an act of war and here is the part of the war powers resolution you missed:
Quote:In the absence of a declaration of war, in any case in which United States Armed Forces are introduced--
(1) into hostilities or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances;
(2) into the territory, airspace or waters of a foreign nation, while equipped for combat, except for deployments which relate solely to supply, replacement, repair, or training of such forces
A no-fly zone is an area in which no unauthorized air craft are permitted to fly. If said air craft do fly then and only then is an engagement authorized. Bombing bases is not part of a no-fly zone as that is an act of war.
Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - KhainiWest - 2011-04-01
kanevaldier Wrote:Right, but any action with our military against a foreign power is an act of war. It does not matter if we are enforcing a no fly zone or not.
And how else do you see "enforcing" no fly zone, it does matter because were not attacking them as an assault, we are enforcing the rules enforced by the UN and showing dicipline. There's a difference that you can't see or trying too hide.
kanevaldier Wrote:Also, a no fly zone does not mean the bombing of equipment unless they are preparing to launch the air craft. We bombed their air bases when there was no such indication. That is an act of war. I dont think you fully understand what an act of war means nor do you understand what a no fly zone is.
Hey look, it's flying, which we said not to do. Yeah I must not understand it.
Also the bombing you're referring too happened the following night after this plane was seen pissing all over the regulation we put on it.
kanevaldier Wrote:Sending our troops into Libyan air space is an act of war
Uh what troops? You consider a missile launch, troops?
kanevaldier Wrote:and here is the part of the war powers resolution you missed:
A no-fly zone is an area in which no unauthorized air craft are permitted to fly. If said air craft do fly then and only then is an engagement authorized. Bombing bases is not part of a no-fly zone as that is an act of war.
The no fly zone and military action to enforce it is essentially an embargo, not a war. We are not engaged in offensive actions to capture and hold Libyan territory or to directly destroy their government. The UN has called on member states to protect civilians from a regime run amok. If this were war we would actually track and target Col Qaddaffi himself instead of just hitting a single building in his compound. It is a subtle distinction between this embargo like action and war, but a distinction none the less.
Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - octopusprime - 2011-04-01
kanevaldier Wrote:Right, but any action with our military against a foreign power is an act of war.
No. I literally just demonstrated to you that such is not the case via the WPR. A document you seem to be extremely convinced is super-relevant to this situation.
Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - kanevaldier - 2011-04-01
KhainiWest Wrote:Also the bombing you're referring too happened the following night after this plane was seen pissing all over the regulation we put on it.
Uh what troops? You consider a missile launch, troops?
The no fly zone and military action to enforce it is essentially an embargo, not a war. We are not engaged in offensive actions to capture and hold Libyan territory or to directly destroy their government. The UN has called on member states to protect civilians from a regime run amok. If this were war we would actually track and target Col Qaddaffi himself instead of just hitting a single building in his compound. It is a subtle distinction between this embargo like action and war, but a distinction none the less.
Wrong, the bombing I am refering to has been going on right from the start since the U.S. began its involvment. Even Obama stated that we were bombing their air bases.
What troops are entering Libyan air space? How about the 2 F-15 fighters that "crased due to malfunction" in Libya. I suppose those are missles too huh? As a side note, I dont by the party line of "malfunction". In all the accidents involving F-15's only 1 has been due to malfunction and now suddenly there are two in the same day, I dont think so.
If we were not bombing or shooting missles at libyan forces then yes your embargo would stand up. However, that said, we are bombing their bases and equipment (with military forces operating said equipment i.e. tanks and such) and that makes it an act of war not an embargo. If you need more clairification on what an embargo is I will be glad to provide it. At the moment the only reason we have not hit his compound is because of his civilian supporters being there. If we hit that then it would create a major issue around the world against the U.S. and this action would be completely invalidated on an international level.
I find it quite funny how we are attacking Libya when at most there were only several thousand protesters, while places like Yemen and Syria go unnoticed. Yemen has several hundred protesters and syria is killing its protesters and we say nothing to them, but we go after the guy who was responding to an apparent civil war. Just doesnt add up if you ask me.
Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - kanevaldier - 2011-04-01
octopusprime Wrote:No. I literally just demonstrated to you that such is not the case via the WPR. A document you seem to be extremely convinced is super-relevant to this situation.
Wrong, this action has not been sanctioned by congress. So your point is mute. Read it again.
Obama's speech on the Libyan conflict vs. the facts - KhainiWest - 2011-04-01
Nevermind. I'm not wasting my opinion on someone who is so convinced that he's right when he can't even get proper dates right.
|