Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. Default Gay marriage ban ruled unconstitutional in Virginia


    http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/lo...245473531.html


    Didn't expect this so soon. Good going Virginia!

  2. Trump minus th money
    IGN: xparasite9
    Server: Windia
    Level: 212
    Job: I/L Archmage
    Guild: KoopaForce
    Alliance: KoopaEmpire

    Default Re: Gay marriage ban ruled unconstitutional in Virginia


    hopefully "marriage" will soon stop being a government-recognized thing altogether, and we'll move to a civil union system across the board.
    access to the privileges (oh, sorry. "right") afforded with this kind of legally binding contract shouldn't be restricted to a prerequisite as silly as "love".

    Seriously how long until asexual civil unions pls

  3. Orbital Bee Cannon
    IGN: SaptaZapta
    Server: Kradia
    Level: 225
    Job: Hero
    Guild: Matriarchy
    Alliance: Dominion

    Default Re: Gay marriage ban ruled unconstitutional in Virginia


    The government has never cared about the sleeping arrangement of married couples (except in the case of immigrants suspected of marrying just for the Green Card).

  4. Nuclear testing facility Straight Male
    IGN: VerrKol
    Server: Zenith
    Level: 204
    Job: Bowmaster
    Guild: LegacyReborn
    Farm: Kolville
    usa

    Default Re: Gay marriage ban ruled unconstitutional in Virginia


    Apparently you missed the articles about weird sex laws.

  5. Orbital Bee Cannon
    IGN: SaptaZapta
    Server: Kradia
    Level: 225
    Job: Hero
    Guild: Matriarchy
    Alliance: Dominion

    Default Re: Gay marriage ban ruled unconstitutional in Virginia


    Those forbid certain activities.
    As far as I know, there are no laws requiring married couples to have sex.

  6. Trump minus th money
    IGN: xparasite9
    Server: Windia
    Level: 212
    Job: I/L Archmage
    Guild: KoopaForce
    Alliance: KoopaEmpire

    Default Re: Gay marriage ban ruled unconstitutional in Virginia


    Well, perhaps aromantic may have been a better choice of word.
    The problem is that when one speaks of marriage, romantic love is heavily implied.

    Why can't we have civil unions between consenting adults of any situation or number? Why does it have to be only two? Why can't it include siblings or nephews/nieces?

    I'm seeing this as more of a culture war than a human rights campaign. Otherwise the focus would have been on phasing out government recognition of marriages, replaced with an updated policy on civil unions.

  7.  

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •