Obscenity

[LegendGospel]

That's just why I hate working with Google. Am I allowed to say moralpapayas? Fruit version will do.

[ResistGreen]

AHha, seriously, for that thread? I bet it didn't cover the JoeTang god of lolis thread.

Google AdSense is being retarded. THAT'S 4 YEARS OLD. I bet half the images don't even exist anymore.

You'd be surprised, 90% of them still exist.

[JoeTang]

AHha, seriously, for that thread? I bet it didn't cover the JoeTang god of lolis thread.

Google AdSense is being retarded. THAT'S 4 YEARS OLD. I bet half the images don't even exist anymore.

Great memories, thank you.

[Pikamemnon]

Hope the appeal goes smoothly, seems kinda weird that the Google robots or w/e picked up on something from so long ago that no one cares about.

[GraveJokerR]

Ouch, sorry to hear about that.

[Five Second Pose]

The number of threads I can "see" (but not access) is related to "me" the user or to everyone?

Only mods, admins, and the person who started the appeal thread can actually see them.

[FelixTM]

lol I love my life right now.

IT'S LIKE THE BUTTERFLY EFFECT. BUT WITH GOOGLE.

And karma, or something.

[Kunagisa]

Google has it cached if anyone is interested.

[Polantaris]

Hope the appeal goes smoothly, seems kinda weird that the Google robots or w/e picked up on something from so long ago that no one cares about.

It's possible that someone, maybe even someone with no relation to SP, searched for such content, found the thread, and the search engine having found the thread threw out the warning for it.
I of course have no idea if that's how it works, but it wouldn't surprise me if it was similar to that scenario.

[street]

How much does sp get from ad sense.?

[Eos]

How much does sp get from ad sense.?

Pretty much our entire operating budget, particularly the portion that pays for extractions. You're not going to get specific numbers.

[G-Meister]

AHha, seriously, for that thread? I bet it didn't cover the JoeTang god of lolis thread.

Google AdSense is being retarded. THAT'S 4 YEARS OLD. I bet half the images don't even exist anymore.

That's why I have a feeling Google is trying to play punk and pull a fast one here, just like Sony going on random infringement allegations about copyright. Case in point: Sony blocking Valentina Lisitsa's Youtube video of the Mozart K466 piano concerto on the grounds that the pianist is Martin Stadtfeld.

Quote from the pianist herself: /* SME , also known as Sony Music Entertainment has claimed that my video clip of Mozart Concerto actually belongs to their artist, somebody named Martin Stadtfeld. */

It's possible that someone, maybe even someone with no relation to SP, searched for such content, found the thread, and the search engine having found the thread threw out the warning for it.
I of course have no idea if that's how it works, but it wouldn't surprise me if it was similar to that scenario.

And this. Precisely. Porn doesn't simply appear on your suggested google searches if you haven't been actively searching for such content.

[Rob]

Great memories, thank you.

Don't even get me started ;)

lol I love my life right now.

IT'S LIKE THE BUTTERFLY EFFECT. BUT WITH GOOGLE.

And karma, or something.

And just that one thread. Imagine all the things buried from 4 years ago!

Google has it cached if anyone is interested.

Interesting. There's a lot of stuff worth bringing up just to pineapple with everyone's memories.

[iamflip]

Pretty much our entire operating budget, particularly the portion that pays for extractions. You're not going to get specific numbers.

Ouch. :c

That said, is there a back-up plan for the funds to continue along?

[Eos]

Ouch. :c

That said, is there a back-up plan for the funds to continue along?

Pick another ad provider at random, rewrite the ad interface to support them, and hope they pay as well or better.
As uncertain as all that is, not worth trying before the 72 appeal window is up.

[MetaSeraphim]

And just that one thread. Imagine all the things buried from 4 years ago!

Oh, don't you know the half it! I remember a bunch of threads from the old days that if posted today would get everyone banned INFRACTIONS! INFRACTIONS EVERYWHERE!

Interesting. There's a lot of stuff worth bringing up just to pineapple with everyone's memories.

It would have to be content safe though I believe. The obscenity rule applies to even if you're quoting something so it should apply to if you post a link to the thread?

[IllegallySane]

Well. looks like I better try to scrub though some of my old posts then........

On the flip side, this is why we can't have nice things and post bikini girls with impunity. Sorry to hear some past actions have somehow come back to bite the site in the metaphorical ass.

[Killed]

looooooooooool.

[CuteBDeadly]

Jeeze that's silly.
I've been getting ads for a "Roman Orgy" here for a few weeks, but this is what they throw a fit over? >_>

IKR I saw that ad too, and thought that was VERY provocative. Maybe Eos could dig up a copy of that ad, and send it their way to show the blatant double standard?

[ShinkuDragon]

IKR I saw that ad too, and thought that was VERY provocative. Maybe Eos could dig up a copy of that ad, and send it their way to show the blatant double standard?

i have the ad saved on my photobucket, i'd post it but i honestly don't know if that would be breaking the obscenity rule -_-