I might opt out of it since I always read everything that shows up in the Suggestions and Announcements forums. It usually calls me back to a thread I've already read and replied.
Nope. This is one that you should "humiliate" those who choose not to participate on. Stick them with the horrible sub-user title.
Why is this different than the chinchilla? Because ads are pineappleing obnoxious and ALWAYS THERE so choosing to view them is an actual sacrifice. Having to view a thread is not an inconvenience. It's why we're here. And if you don't really care then it's two clicks to get out of it. (One to go to the redirected thread, and one to exit it. Don't even have two read if you don't care.)
So, out them. Make the title say "I choose not to read" or something so everyone else is not stuck with these.
Effective immediately new "force read" threads will not re-force people who manage to read them in the time between the thread going live and the force going active to read the thread again.
When the "force" is registered it will automatically credit everyone who's already read the thread manually as having read the thread, the way it should've from the beginning, instead of only counting people who've read it after the force-read was enacted.
Note I can reset at will all history to re force people to the same thread in the event of a major change, like the R&R being updated and requiring a re-read, this is just a change to the default behavior to make it less annoying and encourage more people to remain in the opt in list if the only reason for them leaving was potential redundancy.
|
Bookmarks