New Forum To Ignore...

[Shidoshi]

Are you not using Exclude forums, or is not working on New Posts?

There are forums I don't normally read, but I sometimes take a peek and see if anything interesting showed up. There are also topics I ignore for some time, but will go and read them a few days later.

[Eos]

Nothing stops you from putting them in exclude until you're interested in them and then taking them out to peak and putting it back on when you're done.

It's less effort than wading through them in What's New when you won't want them, and less effort than wading through each forum manually.

[Sarah]

Okay seriously why does Blade & Soul have a forum now. It's not even out. Its existence is making the rest of that section look weird as pineapple.

[Five Second Pose]

Okay seriously why does Blade & Soul have a forum now. It's not even out. Its existence is making the rest of that section look weird as pineapple.

concurring.

[Eos]

Good thing you have the ignore then, huh?

[Sarah]

I don't like ignoring random forums, especially when I have a minor interest in the game. It just doesn't deserve a forum yet. THERE'S NOTHING TO DISCUSS ABOUT IT UNTIL IT CAN BE PLAYED.

Other solutions: remove the god damn "general" from gaming or shorten League of Legends to LoL because everyone calls it that anyway.

[Eos]

What everyone calls it and what a search engine will find mysteriously have little to no correlation.

There's plenty to discuss about a game before it can played, otherwise we'd never talk about KMS content before it gets to GMS.

[Link]

THERE'S NOTHING TO DISCUSS ABOUT IT UNTIL IT CAN BE PLAYED.

That's not true at all.

[Sarah]

Please, then, for the love of god make a new category for MMOs. This seems like it will be a continuing trend anyway.

[Eos]

Please, then, for the love of god make a new category for MMOs. This seems like it will be a continuing trend anyway.

Now that I'll consider.

[Sarah]

Thank you, that looks soooo much better. I don't even notice the added length, surprisingly.

[shouri]

Off topic:
Sarah was "arguing" with Eos. Sarah's title is "Argues with morons". Ergo, Eos is a moron. :D (inb4 I incur Eos's calm wrath)

On topic:
In regards to the new posts discussion earlier.... that's what makes my life so easy. My SP link is a direct link to new posts. I pretty much never visit the main forum page, but when I do I prefer dos equis I like to see a nice organization to the listing. It's not particularly difficult to get used to re-ordering... so long as it makes sense. In fact, it makes it much more friendly to new users if they want a specific section. They can scroll straight down to what they need if it's in alphabetical order as opposed to by-traffic order (because they wouldn't know what gets more traffic if they're new).

More to say, but gots stuff to do.

[MrTouchnGo]

Just a heads up, but there's a minor grammatical error in

If you don't get any replies it's not because no one see it, it's because no one cares.

Should be "no one sees it."

[Sarah]

Off topic:
Sarah was "arguing" with Eos. Sarah's title is "Argues with morons". Ergo, Eos is a moron. :D (inb4 I incur Eos's calm wrath)

More like pleaing.

[shouri]

More like pleaing.

I was joking :D

And also it's why "arguing" is presented with quotes. It's pretty obvious to me that the previous posts between you and Eos don't constitute an argument. I just felt like making a joke along your user title. Hence the need to call it "arguing".

Back to topic:
Thanks for the continual improvements Eos. It's nice to see you actively working on stuff for SP despite all of the other websites you own. Normally I'd get worried that your time would be too heavily divided, but you've shown us otherwise.

[Corn]

The order they were in didn't make any sense either, it wasn't by amount of traffic regardless what you think, and certainly wasn't by any numbering scheme other than the virtue of several not being numbered at all, and this order makes them easier and cleaner for me.

Just bumping up this old thread to say if it is in alphabetical order, "Shenanigans" should be before "The Speakeasy," even if you don't count the The.

[Eos]

Just bumping up this old thread to say if it is in alphabetical order, "Shenanigans" should be before "The Speakeasy," even if you don't count the The.

Maybe we're dyslexic.