Ugh. I really was just going to observe, but this post is so utterly stupid that I must correct it.
If you're going to post an article and try to source it, you should try understanding the content of the article first. The number you quoted ((1/10)^2,680) doesn't represent "the likelihood of randomly creating any life" per your dribble, it represents the odds of "one species giving rise to bacteria and one giving rise to Archaea and eukaryotes" per the actual article.
The probability of a common ancestor among all species on Earth is never actually stated (to my chagrin).
Not if gonna touch your
statement other than to say that pushing back the origin of the first organic matter on earth doesn't make a theory more plausible, it actually makes it worse.
Bookmarks