Originally Posted by
Viaje
No, what you said was what I quoted. However, you went into no explanation as to what exactly the "high level model" was, leading me only to make speculation and assumptions.
And, again, it has changed many times in the past.
Please don't grasp for straws.
Yes, feel free to reverse it. That's perfectly fine, but it has nothing to do with my argument. I'm not saying it will happen; I'm saying it could happen. Or have you not been following along?
It's rather hilarious that you're citing "appeal to probability" when you're the one invoking it.
May wanna read that bit about "A second form of the appeal to probability is the appeal to improbability or an appeal to impossibility in which the odds of an occurrence are drastically downplayed in order to bolster an insecure position or brush aside something that is problematic. This form of the appeal often applies to circumstances where the actual odds are not known."
My argument has not once been that this is or that there will ever be a 120+ PQ that outpaces training.
I've simply been saying that it could be. Therefore, my stance has been "because something could happen, it could happen". Where's the logical fallacy there?
I have not once specifically mentioned either version, so I couldn't have been shifting my argument.
I would, however, love to see a list of these multiple PQs designed for 120+. Only one that comes to mind is VPQ, but that was an event PQ that didn't even give experience for completion.
Not if it was simply an alternative, not a replacement.
She questioned nothing more than what it was. You're the one who went and assumed that the experience would be terrible and all other sorts of things.
I have no idea what mapleadditions is, but I'm not really interested in that.
It is funny that you think I've done anything in this thread that you have not. I just haven't said that I find it annoying.
And yet, you argued against that original post? Still not understanding it.
No, but starting and continuing a speculative argument when you believe "so speculating over it when stuff like this happens is just annoying."
I argued against your original post because there is a difference between speculation and fantasy. Namely, that speculation should be rooted in something.
I do agree that we've veered far from the original matter though, so we can end it here if you'd like.
Don't really intend to have an ongoing discussion about a completely theoretical matter in an extraction thread.
Not worth the energy.
Bookmarks