Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. Default This year's version of SOPA snuck through Congress, 325-100


    http://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/...2015%20IAA.PDF

    tl;dr if you don't want to read it (though you should), this allows "acquisition, retention, and dissemination of covered communications", where "covered communications" is defined as "any nonpublic telephone or electronic communication acquired without the consent of a person who is a party to the communication, including communications in electronic storage".
    This was pushed through at the last minute now BECAUSE it's the last minute, it was a bill in May of this year but it was amended and they waited until now to pass it through. Of course, the panty-bunching caused by the torture report's release probably helped their cause tremendously, and they were able to carry it even further on the "we need more information" narrative.

    Check page 20 of the bill for what I quoted, under "Procedures for the retention of incidentally acquired materials", aka, "pomegranate we had no business taking to begin with"

  2. ~Thrust Into It~ Straight Male
    IGN: Sn1perel1te
    Server: Bellocan
    Level: 152
    Job: Old School BM
    Guild: EbonSol
    Alliance: In One
    California

    Default Re: This year's version of SOPA snuck through Congress, 325-100


    If I remember correctly, one of the things everyone hated about SOPA was that it allowed companies to charge for internet services, or rather, internet providers to charge to premium use (like Time Warner charging Netflix to use its network to allow customers to watch Netflix).

    Although I don't agree with this new on, it essentially puts into law what is already in practice.

  3. Default Re: This year's version of SOPA snuck through Congress, 325-100


    Yes, they are already doing it, but with this they can actually start legally using that information to harrass people, up until now it was illegal so they couldn't be open about doing it or use the information (unless the person had a pomegranatety lawyer/no lawyer and they knew it beforehand, or it was an issue they could sweep under the rug easily).

    The faster/better bandwidth lines to sites/endusers that paid was one issue with SOPA, but certainly not the only one.

  4. Default Re: This year's version of SOPA snuck through Congress, 325-100


    These events are not unrelated.

  5.  

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •