Turkey bans Twitter

[Satellite]

2-3 days late but there's still no thread so...

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...prime-minister

Turkey blocks use of Twitter after prime minister attacks social media site
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan threatens to 'root out' social media network where wiretapped recordings have been leaked


Turkey restricted access to Twitter hours after its prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, threatened to "root out" the social media network where wiretapped recordings have been leaked, damaging the government's reputation ahead of local elections.

Some users trying to use Twitter were taken to a statement apparently from Turkey's telecommunications regulator (TIB).

The statement cited four court orders as the basis for blocking the site, where some users in recent weeks have posted voice recordings and documents purportedly showing evidence of corruption among Erdoğan's inner circle. It said that action had been taken against Twitter as a "protection measure".

But Turkish telecoms watchdog BTK said on Friday that the ban came after complaints were made by citizens that the social media platform was breaching privacy.

The watchdog had previously asked Twitter to remove some content but Twitter had failed to do so, the BTK said in a statement on its website.

"Because there was no other choice, access to Twitter was blocked in line with court decisions to avoid the possible future victimisation of citizens," it said.

The company made no formal statement but published a message on Thursday advising users in Turkey that it was possible to send tweets using mobile phone text messaging.

Erdoğan had made repeated threats to shut down social media sites after audio recordings of his alleged conversations suggesting corruption were leaked.

Two weeks ago he suggested that a total ban on sites like Facebook and YouTube were in his thoughts. The point was dismissed days later by the Turkish president, Abdullah Gul, but Erdoğan then repeated his claims. "We will wipe out all of these," Erdoğan told thousands of supporters at a rally in the north-west province of Bursa.

"The international community can say this, can say that. I don't care at all. Everyone will see how powerful the Republic of Turkey is," he said.

Previously, he said that his government was determined to stem the leaks he insisted were being instigated by followers of an influential US-based Muslim cleric, Reuters reported.

The agency said Erdoğan accused supporters of Fethullah Gülen of infiltrating police and the judiciary and of engaging in "espionage" saying that the group even listened in on his encrypted telephone lines. The Gülen movement denies involvement.

"We are determined on the issue, regardless of what the world may say," Erdoğan said. "We won't allow the people to be devoured by YouTube, Facebook or others. Whatever steps need to be taken we will take them without wavering."

Asked if the steps could include shutting those sites down, Erdoğan reportedly replied: "That included. Because these people or institutions are [using social media] for all kinds of immorality, all kinds of espionage and spying."

Following his speech, Erdoğan's office said in a statement that Erdoğan was referring to what it called Twitter's failure to implement Turkish court orders seeking the removal of some links and that they may be left with no option but to ban the platform.

"If Twitter officials insist on not implementing court orders and rules of law ... there will be no other option but to prevent access to Twitter to help satisfy our citizens' grievances," the statement said.

Turkish internet users were quick to come up with their own ways to circumvent the block. The hashtag #TwitterisblockedinTurkey quickly moved among the top trending globally.

The disruption sparked a virtual uproar with many comparing Turkey to Iran and North Korea, where social media platforms are tightly controlled. There were also calls to take to the street to protest, although some users equally called for calm.

Nazli Ilicak, a columnist who used to work for the pro-government Sabah newspaper described the move as "a civil coup" in an interview on broadcaster CNN Turk.

This guy is a joke. tbh, this shouldn't be allowed to happen in a country that's in NATO etc. and... no hope of getting in EU now at least.
@DavyJonesx probably knows more about this.

[DavyJonesx]

Yea so like.
Erdogan is a twat.
But all the other people that are up for election are even worse, so we're stuck with this idiot.
And btw; with a simple change to our dns, everyone can and is still using twitter.
So I don't really get wtp he's trying to achieve with this.

[Lozmaster]

Yea so like.
Erdogan is a twat.
But all the other people that are up for election are even worse, so we're stuck with this idiot.
And btw; with a simple change to our dns, everyone can and is still using twitter.
So I don't really get wtp he's trying to achieve with this.

You massively overestimate the average persons computing knowledge if you think "everyone" is still using twitter.

[Satellite]

It's just... I can't be the only one seeing the double standard here.

Imagine what USA would've said already, if Putin had announced they're blocking facebook, youtube, twitter in Russia. But oh wow, now when it's a NATO country in question, US or NATO don't say a word! West should get some consistency for their bullcrap.

When this zealot dictator of Turkey decides to declare a war on some country without any reason, will NATO gladly come for help to slaughter innocent civilians?

[Jamesie]

When this zealot dictator of Turkey decides to declare a war on some country without any reason, will NATO gladly come for help to slaughter innocent civilians?

That's not how NATO works.

[Sardines]

Satellite just went full retard.

It's just... I can't be the only one seeing the double standard here. Imagine what USA would've said already, if Putin had announced they're blocking facebook, youtube, twitter in Russia. But oh wow, now when it's a NATO country in question, US or NATO don't say a word! West should get some consistency for their bullcrap.

The White House issued a statement:

The United States is deeply concerned that the Turkish government has blocked its citizens’ access to basic communication tools. We oppose this restriction on the Turkish people’s access to information, which undermines their ability to exercise freedoms of expression and association and runs contrary to the principles of open governance that are critical to democratic governance and the universal rights that the United States stands for around the world. We have conveyed our serious concern to the Turkish government, urge Turkish authorities to respect the freedom of the press by permitting the independent and unfettered operation of media of all kinds, and support the people of Turkey in their calls to restore full access to the blocked technologies.

Russia does have a biased television network called RT that is a highly popular multilingual foreign news channel well known for employing bias and receives heavy funding from the Russian government. RT America has several offices in major United States points such was Washington D.C., New York, Miami, and Los Angeles. So even though Putin hasn't announced censorship, there is a propaganda machine that exerts its presence from the United States wherein which the United States has tolerated its existence within its borders (as far as I am aware). Therefore to address your hypothetical, given the current situation there has been relatively consistent treatment of the situation with respect to how we treat similar problems to your choice of Russia to our inaction in Turkey with respect to national identities exerting inappropriate influence over the media.

I think a more apt analogy given the circumstances may be to the Arab Spring in which Egypt tried to eliminate the country's internet access to prevent protestors from sharing videos and posts regarding the riots. The Obama Administration supported the demonstrations and denounced the actions undertaken by the respective governments as an affront to the concept of liberty, but no military or economic maneuver had been undertaken as a response (again as far as I am aware). Considering that Egypt is not a part of NATO it's not accurate to gauge that your view of hypocrisy isn't a point that should be leveraged only on the basis of NATO but on our hesitance to be involved in foreign affairs after being led by a previous executive who heavily pushed for protecting democracy on a world stage and engaging in a war against a leader with no evidence or rational justification for engaging an invasion.

When this zealot dictator of Turkey decides to declare a war on some country without any reason, will NATO gladly come for help to slaughter innocent civilians?

Yeah, no.