Claims she has a "hidden agenda", that she is a true "Southern Democrat", not the liberal progressive she is "pretending" to be.
http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines...clinton-to-win
Claims she has a "hidden agenda", that she is a true "Southern Democrat", not the liberal progressive she is "pretending" to be.
http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines...clinton-to-win
Last edited by xparasite9; 2016-05-07 at 02:24 PM.
Have elections always been filled with so much stupid?
LOL.
When you know you are hated by the majority, what better way to besmirch a candidate than by endorsing them?
Oh children, let me introduce you to your past;
http://www.livescience.com/5194-pres...s-nastier.html
http://freakonomics.com/2007/11/06/t...ng-for-a-vote/
http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2...-politics.html
http://www.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/wayof...slurs.slogans/
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexpe...ow/presidents/
The past always seems rosier, especially if you didn't live it, because things get glossed over by those who don't want to remember it.
That ain't it, for me at least since I am either not at that age yet (which is totally possible, I promised myself I would never grow up) or because it is impossible for whoever the President is to ever effect me.
For me personally I think it is more the internet ruining another thing by giving everyone a voice to talk with. That and this is the first election that is spilling over into my purposely limited sphere of the internet.
Though those links you posted were top tier. Nothing can make light of the current state of the world better than the insanity of the past.
Consider it would've been 8 years ago that the last real opportunity for this sort of zaniness came up and compare that to your age before making the determination as to why this is the first time you've really noticed it. Pretty sure you're also underestimating the ability for a president to impact you.
Crooked Hillary: rape apologist! Victim blamer!
disgusting!
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinto...ghed-about-it/
WHAT'S TRUE: In 1975, young lawyer Hillary Clinton was requested as lawyer for the defense in a rape case involving a 12-year-old girl; Clinton reluctantly took on the case, successfully challenged mismanaged evidence, and entered a plea bargain for the defendant.
WHAT'S FALSE: Clinton laughed about the unreliable nature of polygraphs, not the case's outcome; Clinton did not volunteer to be the man's lawyer; Clinton did not claim the complainant fantasized about being raped by older men; the case did not go to trial.
snopes engaging in the same "technicality" game that Miss Rodham did.
I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizingI have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body. Also that she exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.
Wow...why is no one talking about Laureate University?
People known for lying and stealing caught lying and stealing, news at 11.
Really though, I don't care to follow what she does anymore, there is nothing she could do that would redeem her in my eyes, she could donate a kidney to a dying child and I would just be left wondering what she got out of it or what she did to that child that required a kidney to shut the family up. I still at least watch Trump because he is entertaining and has a bit of charisma, Hillary is not and does not.
|
Bookmarks