Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: [KMST] KMS 1.2.168 - Angelic Burster

  1. Default KMS 1.2.168 - Angelic Burster


    Want instant notification of new extractions, announcements and updates? Follow Southperry on Twitter!

    How do you feel about the content changed in this patch? Click on "Rate this thread" in the upper right-hand corner of this thread to share your opinion!

    -----

    Usually for KMS threads I try to find things that are substantially different from the KMST counterpart. I'm really struggling to find much of a difference in anything big. So this thread will be quite short. If you'd like to read more about Angelic Burster, see my other thread.

    Other Changes:
    - Magnus's HP is still labeled with question marks.

    NXWatch


    (PvE) Skill Changes

  2. Default Re: KMS 1.2.168 - Angelic Burster


    pineapple.

    Edit: Yeah, why don't you warn me while I edit my post. K? ok. I didn't really come prepared.



  3. Neutron Male
    IGN: Lamato/UhWut
    Server: WindWaker
    Level: 200
    Job: Bowmaster/Shad
    Guild: Cliche
    Alliance: Charm
    usa

    Default Re: KMS 1.2.168 - Angelic Burster


    Oh ma lawd. They are releasing these classes rather quickly.. Time to log into KMS I guess :D

    Guess I got my hopes up too soon.
    Last edited by Lamato; 2012-08-01 at 05:06 PM. Reason: i is ignint

  4. Default Re: KMS 1.2.168 - Angelic Burster


    What's with the rushing? @_@


    Maybe they put the data in and aren't ready to release it? But today is a Thursday and they always do content updates on Thursdays... There's not much delay time there.

  5. Default Re: KMS 1.2.168 - Angelic Burster


    Angelic Buster isn't until next week...at least I believe so.
    This could probably just be a case of porting data so the patch next week won't need to be massive?

  6. Default Re: KMS 1.2.168 - Angelic Burster


    They probably plan on doing a 10 minute like patch or post-midnight ban unlock.

    Gazed: LuxRegalis, Elkaiserum, SaiIorEscada, ChimyakuTeni (AvengeDamien, NonValence)

  7. Default Re: KMS 1.2.168 - Angelic Burster


    MapleStory 5 years ago: OMG ANOTHER CLASS WAT IS THIS MADNESS
    Now: Oh. Another class. Yay.

  8. Default Re: KMS 1.2.168 - Angelic Burster


    Quote Originally Posted by Sewil View Post
    MapleStory 5 years ago: OMG ANOTHER CLASS WAT IS THIS MADNESS
    Now: Oh. Another class. Yay. Not another class =_______=
    I'd prefer them to work on the game mechanics itself and actual content(PQs for example) rather than more jobs. I don't mean potentials either, there's already way too much of that..
    GMS Scania: Dark Knight 200
    GMS Khaini: Luminous 200
    KMS Culverin: Luminous 18x - 루미너스LED
    League of Legends NA: NoirNox

  9. Default Re: KMS 1.2.168 - Angelic Burster


    Hmm, first with Kaiser and now this...don't you normally put the class as the thread title only when the KMS patch actually releases the class? or is that the actual extracted patch name?

    Kinda misleading.

  10. Default Re: KMS 1.2.168 - Angelic Burster


    Quote Originally Posted by xallista View Post
    Hmm, first with Kaiser and now this...don't you normally put the class as the thread title only when the KMS patch actually releases the class? or is that the actual extracted patch name?

    Kinda misleading.
    He names the patch based upon the content, not on Nexon Korea's scheduling.
    Quote Originally Posted by IllegallySane View Post
    Yes Maplestory took ideas from druidic space chickens in WoW and made a class of their own!
    Spectre, Night Stalker, Outworld Destroyer Devourer, Lina, Nyx Assassin, Storm Spirit, and Timbersaw.
    <3 Mouz #excitingdota

  11. Default Re: KMS 1.2.168 - Angelic Burster


    Quote Originally Posted by Raul View Post
    He names the patch based upon the content, not on Nexon Korea's scheduling.
    Now you're confusing me, lol. The thread is named angelic burster but the class itself isn't part of the patch's contents?

    Well its just a minor detail but still...

  12. Default Re: KMS 1.2.168 - Angelic Burster


    Quote Originally Posted by xallista View Post
    Now you're confusing me, lol. The thread is named angelic burster but the class itself isn't part of the patch's contents?

    Well its just a minor detail but still...
    Well, Burster data has been implanted into the official game, just like what happened last time. That's why it's named Burster. Fiel never mentioned that.
    Nintendo ID: GreenYulum

  13. Donator Straight Male
    IGN: ShinkuDragon HoukaPhoenix BoshokuRaven
    Server: Scania
    Level: 152
    Job: Batman
    Guild: IDissOrtis
    panama

    Default Re: KMS 1.2.168 - Angelic Burster


    Quote Originally Posted by xallista View Post
    Now you're confusing me, lol. The thread is named angelic burster but the class itself isn't part of the patch's contents?

    Well its just a minor detail but still...
    ask yourself: what does this patch contain?

    that's what fiel will call it. this patch contains angelic burster, then that's the name the patch gets, wether it is getting released or not with this patch is irrelevant.

    Even among monsters and humans, there are only two types.
    Those who undergo suffering and spread it to others...
    ...and those who undergo suffering, and avoid giving it to others

  14. Default Re: KMS 1.2.168 - Angelic Burster


    Quote Originally Posted by Sewil View Post
    MapleStory 5 years ago: OMG ANOTHER CLASS WAT IS THIS MADNESS
    Now: Oh. Another class. Yay.
    They should just take all the already existing classes, make them permanent, finish adding classes to the races that don't have all 5, and then simply work on improving the existing classes.

    Too bad they won't, and the only new content they add includes a hefty amount of fake difficulty. Like the invincible Magnus.

  15. Default Re: KMS 1.2.168 - Angelic Burster


    Quote Originally Posted by Arrol View Post
    Well, Burster data has been implanted into the official game, just like what happened last time. That's why it's named Burster. Fiel never mentioned that.
    Did you read the name of the thread? Why would I create the name of the thread for something that isn't in the patch?

    EDIT: Nevermind. I can be an idiot sometimes.


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •