Yeah, that's cheating. If the teacher found out you did that in my program, he'd kick you out of the course.
imho, you should practice in b&w first to worry more about value first. The picture you have is nice cuz it's 3/4 view, has okay lighting, and will prolly have decent contrasts 'cause huskies.
- You should always have your ref up as you're drawing. Make it bigger at first and as you progress, shrink it so it's not taking up as much space.
- Do a basic sketch to figure out proportions before working on a base layer.
- With furry creatures like this, you need to work from the bottom up ― think about the undercoat first before thinking of the fur that's hit by light.
Without looking at the ref, your head actually works, but the paws are really off. Since you're looking at reference, there's much to be done. I'm not going to comment on colour, just form/proportion/basics.
- Watch the tilt of the muzzle/head. The eyebrows are kind of throwing me off 'cause they aren't developed, but your head isn't angled at the ground enough ― muzzle makes this very apparent.
- Use landmarks to help with proportion. If you drew a line vertically from its right ear up, you'll notice that your ears off from the photo.
- If looking at the husky is daunting, look at the space around it instead. Negative space helps with tricky shapes.
- Think of the structure first and how it effects the fur on top. And look more closely to see the direction the fur is moving.
I'm just gunna assume you're using photoshop and a tablet.
- If you use a default, stippled-like brush [I used some kind of dry brush], stipple down varying shades of the same colour, and use a smudge tool with ~40% strength with a stippled-like brush, you can easily create the peppered undercoat.
- imho you shouldn't play with opacity too much yet, playing with flow + spacing does a more consistent job.
- Think of the parts of the fluff, like the ears, as clumps. Use a darker colours to create the initial base clumps and then go over with a smaller, lighter coloured brush to trick us into thinking there's more detail than there really is.
- The top-most fur would be done individually. It sounds overwhelming, but again, it's about tricking people into thinking there's more detail than there really is.
In my class, we've only been working on the undercoat and some details like nose, eyes, mouth, etc. Here's an example of my initial base to where I currently stand with the rough being due tomorrow:
http://puu.sh/28zew
The fun part is that it's all done with a default photoshop brush.