Calculating Stat vs Att/M.Att (Prime Scrolls)

Okay, so the obvious answer to this is to just add everything up and compare the two, but is that really all there is to it? I feel like there's a formula or something I should be using to calculate it more accurately. How does secondary stat factor into it as well? Do I need to factor in % Stats/% M.Att?
1.19 Int:1 M.Att that I got from calculating mine doesn't make any sense to me.

if you go beyond that, constants start to get annoying, there was a thread with a massive formula but i couldn't find it, best i could find was this.

http://www.southperry.net/showthread.php?t=54311

edit: if you have an INORDINATE amount of attack compared to int, then that ratio doesn't seem too far off really, i myself am somewhere around 2.5 to 1.

Yes, you'll definitely have to consider your %stats. Not much with %ma as it is multiplicative to both your MA and stat portion of the formula(4P+S).

Removing multipliers and such:

(4P+S)*A=R

4P+S : A is what you need to be taking into consideration, where

P=Primary stat * (1+Primary%) + Primary stat that doesn't get affected by stat%
S= ^Replace primary with secondary
A=M/Attack

Edit: usually though your secondary stat is negligible, so it's simply P:A

i.e. Primary Stat : Attack / (1+Primary stat%)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Liable

Yes, you'll definitely have to consider your %stats. Not much with %ma as it is multiplicative to both your MA and stat portion of the formula(4P+S).

Removing multipliers and such:

(4P+S)*A=R

4P+S : A is what you need to be taking into consideration, where

P=Primary stat * (1+Primary%) + Primary stat that doesn't get affected by stat%
S= ^Replace primary with secondary
A=M/Attack

Edit: usually though your secondary stat is negligible, so it's simply 4P:A

---

If you ignore secondary stats, you dont use the 4x multiplier nor the potential, since the formula becomes a straight multiplication

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ShinkuDragon

If you ignore secondary stats, you dont use the 4x multiplier nor the potential, since the formula becomes a straight multiplication

---

Oh.. yes. Brb correcting. (In fact you reminded me something else too)

Alright that's easy enough, thanks guys.

Would comparing the effect of an allstat potion (Blessing) to that of an attack potion be a good way to avoid having to add up all sources of att and stats?
(In other words, do potions enter the formula at the same place as +stat/att on gear?)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SaptaZapta

Would comparing the effect of an allstat potion (Blessing) to that of an attack potion be a good way to avoid having to add up all sources of att and stats?
(In other words, do potions enter the formula at the same place as +stat/att on gear?)

---

Pretty sure they do, i know apples and such did but never bothered checking with stat potions, shouldnt be any different though